China has many people. Dillard uses this statistic-question setup often. And Dillard gives us plenty of statistical reasons for this as well. By demonstrating the fact that most people simply went about their day when, or even if, they heard about this tragedy, she exemplifies the fact that most of us were unfazed by this news and compassion for these victims was completely nonexistent.
This is what Dillard wants us to realize, and this is what she wants us to correct. Where were you when you first heard the astounding heartbreaking news? Without compassion for one another, statistics remain statistics and we lose what makes us human.
However, after a few reads it becomes clear through constant questioning in the piece that these numbers should mean more to us than they do. Among us we speak 10, languages. More than 2 percent of us are mentally retarded. In another example, Dillard presents a quote from her own daughter showing that we simply do not feel remorseful when a tragedy affects people we are not losely related to.
Quotations are used frequently in the essay, mainly to help jolt the readers mind into thinking about the opposite point of view. After giving us overwhelming numbers and statistics, Dillard then questions us often. At dinner I mentioned this to my daughter, who was then seven years old that it was hard to imaginepeople drowning.
But we can only hope. Comparisons are another big theme in the essay and to which Dillard uses very effectively.
Dillard also contrasts to help give the reader a different viewpoint.
Did your anguish last day or weeks? One fifth of us live in China. And every seventh person is a Chinese peasant. It may seem that Dillard pulled these different facts randomly, but it is just that that represents who we are. Dillard is trying to show us that we do not have enough compassion for our fellow human beings.
Ten years ago we thought there were two galaxies for each of us alive. Stalin starved 7 million Ukrainians in one year, Pol Pot killed 1 million Cambodians, the flu epidemic of killed 21 or 22 million people… shall this go on? Dillard wants us to think about individuality and to think about these numbers and determine for ourselves whether having nine galaxies to each one of us really changes the fact that we are each individuals.
The reader is left to make sense of the statistics, fill in the gaps, and draw his or her own conclusions.Analysis of "The Wreck of Time" by Annie Dillard Essays: OverAnalysis of "The Wreck of Time" by Annie Dillard Essays, Analysis of "The Wreck of Time" by Annie Dillard Term Papers, Analysis of "The Wreck of Time" by Annie Dillard Research Paper, Book Reports.
ESSAYS, term and research papers available for UNLIMITED access. Analysis of the Poem The Wreck of Deutschland by Gerard Manley Hopkins Essay - The SS Deutschland, an iron passenger steamship of the Norddeutscher Lloyd line, was on a maiden voyage to New York from Bremen.
Will M. Annie Dillard’s “The Wreck of Time” Annie Dillard's "The Wreck of Time" is a unique piece of writing. The essay has no clear thesis statement, lacks transitions between paragraphs and provides no obvious connection between its various subsections.
Custom Written Essays Order plagiarism free custom written essay All essays are written from scratch by professional writers according to your instructions and delivered to your email on time.
Analysis of Diving Into the Wreck Essay Analysis of Diving Into the Wreck There are many poems in today’s literature that are detailed and paint a picture for the reader. A poem that really stands out is Diving Into the Wreck by Adrienne Rich.
The Wreck of Time By Annie Dillard Ted Bundy, the serial killer, after his arrest, could not fathom the fuss. What was the big deal? David Von Drehle quotes an exasperated Bundy in Among the Lowest of the Dead: "I mean, there are so many people." One R.
Houwink, of Amsterdam, uncovered this unnerving fact: The human population of.Download