He made a large number of mistakes and was openly ridiculed by his political opponents. Caesar had come from a fallen family and this served to his detriment.
During this time, a civil war raged between his uncle Gaius Marius and Lucius Cornelia Sulla, his political rival. Caesar was accustomed to his orders not being challenged; he could not comprehend the audacity of his opponents when they opposed him publicly.
His approach though had effect and he did succeed in taking control of Rome. This is indication to his integrity, but proved to be a factor in his death, and therefore a clear fault, but his decision making.
Caesar, although he did not escape the same fate, avoided it for many years because of his military backing. Caesar was not so skilled in the practice of challenging his rivals in the Senate. The men who killed him were a mixture of both his longest serving deputies and his former enemies, as examples Trebonius and Cassius respectively.
During his consulship, Caesar gained a governorship which gave him command of four legions. Early on he established himself as a populares.
These powers surpassed any previously given to a general of the Republic before. Now, on to the play itself.
While he, Octavius, and Lepidus ultimately form a triumvirate to return the state to stability, in fact, that it is a ruling structure fraught with problems.
At the time this play was performed incivil strife was within living memory. His lack of ability in this area doomed him to failure. These characters give readers a sense that the people themselves are a sort of amorphous mass, potentially dangerous and, at the same time, absolutely essential to the success of the ruling class.
And what was the Republic, compared to their general? Celebrating victories is a way to thank and acknowledge your team members for a job well done, and provide motivation to continue on and attain your goals.
At the point in ancient history in which Julius Caesar is set, Rome was becoming slightly more democratic — well, democratic in their terms, not in modern ones. He did not try hard enough to persuade the Senate to his view.
He adopted his customary approach to reach compromise before using force, but his arrogant approach to the Senate destroyed any moderate support for him.At the point in ancient history in which Julius Caesar is set, Rome was becoming slightly more democratic — well, democratic in their terms, not in modern ones.
Tribunes, meant as representatives of the people, were being elected in order to protect them from the rigors of tyranny. Julius Caesar can be considered both a good and bad leader. Caesar's ability to rise through the ranks quickly and to command armies at such a young age are good examples of his natural leadership.
Julius Caesar Essay Throughout the play “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare, there is a very evident case of a tragic hero. A tragic hero is “a man of noble stature who is not an ordinary man, but a man with outstanding quality and greatness about him.
Dec 10, · Originally Answered: What makes Julius Caesar a good leader? Just after his failure in Britain, Caesar's fleet got scattered by a storm and some of his soldiers were stranded in hostile territory, surrounded and in danger.
Julius Caesar was a military general and statesman during the Roman Republic. He had a profound impact on Western civilization as a military leader, politician, writer and historian.
May 30, · Gaius Julius Caesar, one of the world’s greatest military leaders, was born into a senatorial, patrician family and was the nephew of another famous Roman general, Marius.Download