Using Anki to do shallow reads of papers Most of my Anki-based reading is much shallower than my read of the AlphaGo paper. So, to get a picture of an entire field, I usually begin with a truly important paper, ideally a paper establishing a result that got me interested in the field in the first place.
I do a thorough read of that paper, along the lines of what I described for AlphaGo. Part of the reason is mundane: As discussed earlier, Anki offers something like a fold improvement over say ordinary Praxis 2 social studies essay questions.
But it was far easier than it would have been otherwise. But it becomes an integrative question, part of a hierarchy of questions building up from simple atomic facts to more complex ideas.
The main reason is that I like to remember the experience of the painting from time to time. And it certainly becomes true if you construct more complex cards, cards relating the basic fact to be remembered to other ideas like the Telstar-ASCII linkgradually building up a web of richly interrelated ideas.
And you need to solve real problems with it. I certainly understood AlphaGo well enough that I was confident I could write the sections of my article dealing with it. Each measure has been thoroughly researched and demonstrated to be reliable and valid indicators of early literacy development and predictive of later reading proficiency to aid in the early identification of students who are not progressing as expected.
Memory is fundamental to our thinking, and the notion of having a perfect memory is seductive. That still seems to be poorly understood. This kind of rabbit hole seems to be especially attractive to programmers. For seminars and conversations with colleagues I find it surprisingly helpful to set Anki quotas.
Or something verbal rather than a motor skill. Many of the questions I was putting into Anki were high level, sometimes on the verge of original research directions. With that said, there are some valuable deck-sharing practices.
So a one-day gap between reviews becomes two days, then six days, then a fortnight, and so on. And so using Anki in this way gives confidence you will retain understanding over the long term.
Long-term memory is sometimes disparaged. Procedural versus declarative memory: They found that world-class chess experts saw the board differently to beginners. Although written inmany of the observations in the paper remain true today.
The challenges of using Anki to store facts about friends and family: This time the purpose was to understand AlphaGo in detail. They seem less well developed for more abstract concepts, and such abstractions are often where the deepest understanding lies.
Feynman or his father goes on to a thoughtful discussion of real knowledge: You might suppose the foundation would be a shallow read of a large number of papers. Humanity had a telecommunications satellite before we had a digital standard for communicating text!
I should say at the outset: In this section we briefly look at one of the key underlying ideas from cognitive science, known as distributed practice. Construct your own decks:Praxis II Social Studies: Content and Interpretation () Praxis II Sociology () Praxis II exam questions will typically be either selected response questions or essay questions.
Each question is designed to assess the test taker’s knowledge and abilities to perform adequately as a beginning teacher. Because each Praxis II test. The Praxis® Study Companion 5 Step 1: Learn About Your Test 1.
Learn About Your Test Learn about the specific test you will be taking Social Studies: Content Knowledge (). PRAXIS II Format. The questions in this exam are based on case studies, and may be either in multiple-choice or constructed-response format. Teaching Foundation Tests assess teaching knowledge in five subject areas: English, language arts, mathematics, social science, and science.
Explore our free Praxis II Social Studies: Content Knowledge practice test questions. Get ready for your test using our review tips! By Michael Nielsen.
One day in the mids, a Moscow newspaper reporter named Solomon Shereshevsky entered the laboratory of the psychologist Alexander Luria. Test measure: Measures student's awareness of the individual sounds in words.
Purpose: Assesses phonological awareness, phonological memory, and rapid naming. The CTOPP has 4 principal uses: (1) to identify individuals who are significantly below their peers in important phonological abilities, (2) to determine strengths and weaknesses among .Download